<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>46alpha &#187; influence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.46alpha.com/tag/influence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.46alpha.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2010 16:47:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Your Twitter &#039;influence ratio&#039;: is it just about your numbers?</title>
		<link>http://www.46alpha.com/2009/02/20/your-twitter-influence-ratio-is-it-just-about-your-numbers-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.46alpha.com/2009/02/20/your-twitter-influence-ratio-is-it-just-about-your-numbers-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>46alpha</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogpost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.46alpha.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*** The below post has been transferred without comments from another blog which was hosted on Ning. The post has been backdated to its original publishing date *** I got a Tweet the other day and it was from someone I did not know in a field I was not interested in. The post said [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;">
			<a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.46alpha.com%2F2009%2F02%2F20%2Fyour-twitter-influence-ratio-is-it-just-about-your-numbers-2%2F"><br />
				<img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.46alpha.com%2F2009%2F02%2F20%2Fyour-twitter-influence-ratio-is-it-just-about-your-numbers-2%2F&amp;style=normal" height="61" width="50" /><br />
			</a>
		</div>
<p>*** The below post has been transferred without comments from another blog which was hosted on Ning. The post has been backdated to its original publishing date ***</p>
<p>I got a Tweet the other day and it was from someone I did not know in a field I was not interested in. The post said something to the affect of &#8216;I have followed you, now follow me and then unfollow in order to complete the opt-out process&#8217;. When I started my Twitter account, I went to some of the communication and PR twitter accounts that were of interest to me and then followed some of their followers. The thought was that since I was interested in PR, communications, etc, there would probably be some interesting posts from other people interested in the same topics that I am.</p>
<p>I had been thinking about Twitter accounts before I received this message, but after receiving it, it only reinforced my original thought &#8211; Twitter is just about getting the most number of followers, no matter how you do it. It seems like a competition, or a one-ups manship. If you have a lot of followers, you are seen as a person of &#8216;influence&#8217; in your respective field. Since professionally I would say Twitter is used primarily by communication professionals either as themselves or as a member of an organizational team, it becomes a competition of who has the most amount of followers.</p>
<p>I followed about 800 initially and at the moment have about 400 followers, and there is no way I am able to keep up with all the traffic. Whenever I get onto Tweetdeck, it is just a matter of luck whether or not someone else is on at the same time and sends something I see of interest to me.</p>
<p>It is still fun. I like the direct messages with random people; a sort of brief meeting, or an exchange between people while passing in the online hallways of Twitter High School. Unless I want to create a new Twitter account and follow only those individuals that I have the time to scan through their tweets, I am stuck in the land of follower numbers. Looks like my current &#8216;influence&#8217; ratio is 877/418 (following to followers), slightly under 50%. Am I concerned? No. Can I keep up with all the traffic as is? No.</p>
<p>Oops, got to go, I just saw I have a new follower&#8230;</p>
 
   <div class = ""><iframe src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://www.46alpha.com/tag/influence/feed/"&layout=standard&show_faces=false&width=450&action=like&colorscheme=light" scrolling="no" frameborder="0" allowTransparency="true" style="border:none; overflow:hidden; width:450px; height:px"></iframe></div>
   ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.46alpha.com/2009/02/20/your-twitter-influence-ratio-is-it-just-about-your-numbers-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
